DASH-ONTO Ontology Documentation
Welcome to the DASH-ONTO documentation!
You can find descriptions of the standard ontology engineering workflows here.
Glossary
Terms and definition
term | definition |
---|---|
DASH DC Monitor process | A project component activity that permits DASH to restart DC-specific DC activities and communicate this fact to the DC, the latter taking appropriate actions in response. |
DASH Data advice | A process by which a DASH User acquires information about metadata, data metrics and data provenance elements of data items, as well as selection functions. |
DASH Oversight | A DASH coordination process in which a project workflow is directed to provide one of: DASH guidance to a PRG; allow for the completion of a form associated with an HDC application process; termination of a project, including a project debrief. |
DASH Support advice | A process by which a DASH User acquires information about services offered by a data custodian. |
DASH TEA Monitor process | A project component activity that permits DASH to restart DC-specific TEA activities and communicate this fact to the DC, the latter taking appropriate actions in response. |
DASH eligibility advice | A process by which a DASH User acquires information about eligibility requirements from a data custodian. |
DC Agreement drafting | A process which has as expected output a draft of a legal agreement between a PRG and a DC (Glossary: Agreement drafting). |
DC Agreement resource and cost review | A resource and cost review which finalises costs and resource use for inclusion within a legal agreement between a PRG and a DC. |
DC Agreement signature | An agreement signature where the required parties are a data custodian and a project research group. |
Data Access Request Review | A review performed by a DASH to confirm that information required by an HDC application process is complete and available for submission to the HDC |
Data availability cohort review | A review performed by a data custodian team in collaboration with a project research group which assesses whether the [cohort] data item requirements defined by a project protocol can be fullfilled by a data custodian. |
Data availability extract review | A review performed by a data custodian team in collaboration with a project research group which assesses whether the [extract] data item requirements defined by a project protocol can be fullfilled by a data custodian. |
Data controller review | A review performed by a data controller team which evaluates project protocol alignment with its policies and, if applicable, delegated data control agreements |
Data custodian Project cohort preparation | A data selection by which a project cohort identifier list is generated. |
Data custodian data preparation | A data processing generating a new data asset using a transformation function which has as input a set of datasets. |
Data custodian privacy enhancing technique processing | A sub-process of data assembly by which privacy enhancing technique functions are applied by a data custodian technical team to the dataset which is the output of the data preparation. |
Data eligibility review | An eligibility review performed by a data custodian team which uses custodian-defined governance criteria to establish the right of the project research group to have a project protocol evaluated by the DCG team. |
Data estimated resource cost review | A review performed by a data custodian team which determines resources and cost required to provide access to data items, and other requested services options (if applicable). |
Data placement | A process by which a D-SPD is copied to another organisation's infrastructure or a TEA. |
Data processing | A process by which a dataset is generated by applying a function to a set of datasets. |
Data transformation | A data processing generating a new data asset using a transformation function which has as input a set of datasets. |
Ethics assessment review | A application element review which ensures that appropriate documentation arising from an ethics committee assessment was submitted as part of an application process. |
Funding review | An application element review which ensures that an appropriate documentation from some funding source was submitted as part of an application process. |
Non-disclosure agreement review | A review performed by a DC confirming the completion and usability of a non-disclosure agreement. |
Privacy Enhancing Technique Review | A review by a DC confirming that PET processing has been performed during a data assembly. |
Privacy, Confidentiality and Security Review | A review with the goal of ensuring that privacy and patient-practitioner confidentiality are not compromised during processes directed by the project protocol. |
Process DASH data custodian instruction | A DASH instruction to a DC, sent by an agreed method, requesting a DC-related project component activity be completed. |
Process DASH project research group instruction | A DASH instruction to a PRG, sent by an agreed method, requesting a PRG-related project component activity be completed. |
Process DASH trusted environment for analysis instruction | A DASH instruction to a DC, sent by an agreed method, requesting a TEA-related project component activity be completed. |
Project analysis data output review | A review conducted by a data controller team to evaluate whether a project analysis data output can be transferred to a different data custodian as requested by a PRG. |
Project debrief | A process performed by a DASH following the decision and action to end a project - in conjunction with a PRG and participating DCs - to learn lessons from that project. |
Project publication drafting | A process by which project research group members include a project analysis data output into an artefact for release to the wider interested community. |
Project publication review | A review conducted by a organisation team to evaluate whether a project publication candidate can be made available outside the project research group. |
Project research group orientation validation | A project research group activity by which one or more project research group members demonstrate knowledge of the requirements that a data custodian places on the use and handling of D-SPD provided to ensure continued good governance of that D-SPD and associated project analysis and publication. |
Scientific assessment review | An application element review which ensures that appropriate documentation arising from a Scientific Peer review assessment was submitted as part of an application process. |
Scored data custodian cost | A resource and cost valuation by a DASH based on aggregate data associated with similar projects performed in the past by that DASH. |
Send signal | A planned process by which a plan entity sends a specific signal to a specified channel. |
TEA Agreement drafting | A process which has as expected output a draft of a legal agreement between a PRG and a TEA provider. |
TEA Agreement resource and cost review | A resource and cost review which finalises costs and resource use for inclusion within a legal agreement between a PRG and a TEA provider. |
TEA Agreement signature | An agreement signature where the required parties are those data custodians contributing to the TEA and a project research group. |
TEA eligibility review | An eligibility review performed by a TEA provider which uses custodian-defined governance criteria to establish the right of the project research group to have a project protocol evaluated by that TEA provider. |
TEA estimated resource and cost review | A resource and cost review which estimates the costs and resources expected to be used by a TEA provider in the fulfilment of a project protocol. |
TEA support review | A requested services review performed by a TEA provider. |
Wait for signal | A planned process by which a plan entity waits until a specific signal is available through a specified channel; then ends. |